|
Pollutant levels in lower Manhattan after Sept. 11
may have been higher than those reported by previous researchers,
according to a study by Canadian scientists.
Six weeks after the 2001 World Trade Center attacks,
film found on windows within one kilometer (.62 miles) of Ground Zero
revealed high levels of PCBs, flame retardants and other organic
pollutants. Concentrations of the chemicals were up to 10 times
greater than New York City's normal background levels and possibly 100
times higher than surrounding rural areas.
The report is scheduled to appear in the July 1
print edition of Environmental Science & Technology, a
peer-reviewed journal of the American Chemical Society, the world's
largest scientific society.
"We were very concerned just after 9/11, as were
most people in North America," says Miriam Diamond, a professor in the
Department of Geography at the University of Toronto and lead author
of the paper. "We were sitting around the lab shortly after the attack
and said, 'Why don't we go down and use our simple method to see what
the contaminant levels are like?'"
Diamond's method involved "washing a bunch of
windows" in lower Manhattan and then analyzing the resulting samples
for four potentially toxic organic pollutants: polybrominated diphenyl
ethers (PBDEs), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs),
polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and polychlorinated naphthalenes (PCNs).
"All the samples within one kilometer of the World
Trade Center were high," Diamond says. "For the PAHs, PCNs and PCBs,
they were about a factor of 10 relative to Brooklyn." A site in
Brooklyn was used as a baseline for the New York City area because of
its location 3.5 kilometers upwind of the towers.
Diamond's earlier research in Toronto showed a
similar factor of 10 difference between window films in urban and
rural locations, so the concentrations near Ground Zero could have
been as much as 100 times greater than surrounding rural areas, she
deduces.
In the aftermath of Sept. 11, many scientists
converged on Manhattan to study the fallout from the attacks,
including a team that suggested the potential risk of exposure from
inhaling toxic organic compounds was lower than expected. The
researchers reported no evidence of PCBs and, while they did find some
PAHs, they said the particles were too big to pose a threat to human
health.
This earlier team may have detected lower levels
because their samples were diluted by the large amounts of building
material emitted in the initial explosion, according to Diamond. "By
the time we got there six weeks later, we were picking up the signal
of the slow burn, not the catastrophic expulsion of debris," she says.
Diamond is hesitant to speculate about potential
health effects for a number of reasons, including the limited number
of samples: the findings were based on window films from only nine
buildings in lower Manhattan. [MD1]
She was surprised that concentrations dropped to
background levels beyond one kilometer from Ground Zero. "To me that's
good news; I thought it would be further," Diamond says. "The flip
side is that it's bad news that New York City and other urban areas
have such high background concentrations of these compounds."
New York City, with a population of about 8 million,
had twice the background levels of PBDEs typically found in Toronto, a
city of about 4.5 million people. Beyond population differences, the
higher concentrations in New York could be due to the incredible
density of the "technosphere" - the large mass of manmade material,
Diamond suggests.
"This should be seen in the context of a continuum,"
Diamond continues. "The urban areas contain the largest mass of these
chemicals. They're storehouses, in effect, and we're fools to think
that they're permanent storehouses." Whereas these attacks were a
catastrophic event, building fires are extremely common in cities,
releasing chemicals to the urban atmosphere on a daily basis. More
research needs to be done to examine how these fires affect exposure
to hazardous pollutants, according to Diamond. |